In a Nutshell

Network monitoring requires a non-intrusive way to capture traffic. Port Mirroring, commonly implemented as SPAN (Switched Port Analyzer), allows a switch to duplicate traffic from one or more ports to a diagnostic destination. This article explores the mechanics of local SPAN, Remote SPAN (RSPAN), and the performance trade-offs of deep packet inspection.

The Mirroring Mechanic

In a switched environment, traffic is delivered only to the specific port where the destination MAC address resides. To monitor this traffic—for security auditing or troubleshooting—we must instruct the switch fabric to 'mirror' (copy) packets.

Port Mirroring (SPAN) Simulator

Traffic Replication & Visibility

Switch Fabric (ASIC)
SOURCE A
SOURCE B
DESTINATION
IDS / SNIFFER
Analyzer Bandwidth:1.0 Gbps
Traffic Load:0.0 Gbps

Source and Destination Dynamics

A SPAN session consists of a Source (ports or VLANs being monitored) and a Destination (the port where the sniffer/IDS is connected).

  • Ingress (RX): Monitors traffic entering the source.
  • Egress (TX): Monitors traffic leaving the source.
  • Both: Full duplex visibility.

Performance Impact (The CPU Tax)

Most modern enterprise switches perform port mirroring in hardware (ASICs), resulting in zero impact on switching performance. However, entry-level switches or excessive ERSPAN (Encapsulated RSPAN) sessions can place significant load on the Control Plane processor.

ERSPAN: Monitoring the Cloud

In modern data centers, traffic often moves between virtual machines on different hosts. ERSPAN uses GRE (Generic Routing Encapsulation) to tunnel mirrored traffic across a Layer 3 network, allowing you to centralize your monitoring cluster in a different subnet or even a different site.

PacketoriginalGRE HeaderIP Header (Monitoring Endpoint)\text{Packet}_{original} \to \text{GRE Header} \to \text{IP Header (Monitoring Endpoint)}

Conclusion

Effective network visibility is balanced between coverage and capacity. Whether using local SPAN for a quick debug or RSPAN for enterprise-wide security, the fundamental rule remains: ensure your destination port can handle the aggregate bandwidth of your mirrored sources.

Share Article

Technical Standards & References

REF [1]
Cisco Systems (2023)
Introduction to Cisco IOS SPAN and RSPAN
Published: Technical Documentation
VIEW OFFICIAL SOURCE
REF [2]
Wireshark Foundation (2024)
Network Analysis using Packet Sniffing
Published: Best Practices Guide
VIEW OFFICIAL SOURCE
Mathematical models derived from standard engineering protocols. Not for human safety critical systems without redundant validation.

Related Engineering Resources