View Mode
GridFix Labs Reference Series | Cloud & Software-Defined
Firewall Performance Trade-offs
Throughput vs. Security Inspection
GridFix Technical Team Last Updated: January 31, 2026 11 min read Read
Verified by Engineering
The Inspection Spectrum
Not all firewalling is created equal. The more 'layers' the firewall uncurls, the more CPU cycles it consumes.
Stateful Inspection Engine
Connection Tracking System
CLIENT192.168.1.10
INSPECT
SERVER10.0.0.5
INTERNET
Traffic Generator
STATE TABLE
Allow: 0Drop: 0
Empty State Table
The TLS Decryption Tax
Today, >90% of web traffic is encrypted (HTTPS). To inspect this traffic for malware, the firewall must perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) decryption:
- Intercept the client's handshake.
- Decrypt the traffic using a local certificate.
- Inspect the payload.
- Re-encrypt the traffic for the destination.
This process is computationally expensive. Enabling full TLS Decryption can drop a firewall's rated throughput by 50% to 80%.
Performance Optimizations
- Hardware Offload (ASICs/FPGA): Moving encryption and pattern matching into dedicated chips.
- Single-Pass Architecture: Performing all security checks (AV, IPS, App Control) in a single unified scan rather than serial processing.
Conclusion
A firewall is a compromise between safety and speed. By understanding where your bottlenecks lie—whether in CPU-bound encryption or packet-header logic—you can design a perimeter that protects without choking the business.
Technical Standards & References
REF [1]
J.M. Stewart (2020)
Network Security: Firewalls and VPNs
Published: Jones & Bartlett Learning
REF [2]
Cisco Systems (2022)
The Performance Impact of Deep Packet Inspection
Published: Technical White Paper
Mathematical models derived from standard engineering protocols. Not for human safety critical systems without redundant validation.