Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAID) is a fundamental technology for balancing performance and data safety. However, not all RAID levels are created equal when it comes to reliability. As disk capacities increase, the probability of a Unrecoverable Read Error (URE) during a RAID rebuild becomes a critical factor in system design.

RAID 0 (Striping)

Zero redundancy. Reliability decreases exponentially with every added disk. If any drive fails, all data is lost.

RAID 1/10 (Mirroring)

Full redundancy. Data is duplicated across pairs. Survives the loss of 50% of disks if failures occur in different mirrors.

RAID 5/6 (Parity)

Distributed parity. RAID 5 survives 1 disk failure; RAID 6 survives 2. Capacity vs. Reliability sweet spot.

RAID Parity Reconstruction Simulator

XOR-Based Data Recovery

DATA 0
0xA
DATA 1
0xC
DATA 2
0x3
DATA 3
0xF
DATA 4
0x5
PARITY P
0xF
RAID LEVEL
RAID 5
FAULT TOLERANCE
1 Disk
USABLE CAPACITY
83%

Click disks to simulate failures. RAID 5 uses single parity (P) via XOR, tolerating 1 disk failure. RAID 6 adds a second parity (Q) using Reed-Solomon codes, tolerating 2 simultaneous failures. During rebuild, the array is vulnerable—if another disk fails before reconstruction completes, all data is lost.

Interactive RAID Simulator

Model your storage array by selecting the RAID level, disk count, and individual disk reliability (MTBF). The simulator will calculate the cumulative system reliability and the probability of data loss over the specified mission time.

Array Config

Distributed Parity - Balanced capacity and safety (1-disk fault tolerance).

Array Reliability
99.7265%
Probability of data persistence
Data Loss Risk
0.2735%
Estimated over 3 years

Array Topology: RAID 5

Effective Capacity: 24 TB
DISK 1
DISK 2
DISK 3
DISK 4
Parity
RAID MTBF Calculation

The calculation uses the survival probability of independent components. Note that real-world reliability is often lower due to "correlated failures" (disks from the same batch failing simultaneously) and the performance penalty of rebuilding an array which puts extreme stress on surviving drives.

The Rebuild Paradox

Modern reliability engineering warns that RAID 5 is increasingly risky for high-capacity drives (12TB+). The time required to rebuild a failed array and the mathematical probability of a second drive failing or a URE occurring during that window significantly threatens data integrity.

Engineering Note: For critical enterprise data using high-capacity SAS/SATA drives, RAID 6 (Dual Parity) is the minimum recommended standard to mitigate the risk of "Rebuild Failure".

Related Engineering Resources

Share Article

Technical Standards & References

REF [1]
Jon Elerath (2007)
The Reliability of RAID Storage Systems
Technical analysis of RAID failure modes and MTTDL calculations.
REF [2]
Alexander Thomasian (2021)
Storage Systems: Organization, Performance, and Reliability
Comprehensive overview of modern storage array reliability modeling.
Mathematical models derived from standard engineering protocols. Not for human safety critical systems without redundant validation.

Related Engineering Resources